I went to my first Saints game on March 16th 1967, when on my 8th birthday my Dad (not really a football fan) took me to watch that days home game against West Ham. I have been a fan ever since and will be for the rest of my life. One of the things that any neutral fan would say if you asked them to identify the Saints would be "red and white stripes" There have been variations on a theme, particularly in the 1980's, but red and white shirts, black shorts and red/white/black socks has been by and large the Saints kit since 1900.
For our 125th anniversary the club, as a mark of respect to our heritage, did a "one off' home kit of a white shirt with a red sash, which reflected the very earliest kits that the club wore. Fans understood that and largely it was welcomed and looked very good. The next year though they went back to a red and white striped shirt and all was well.
Last season the club broke with tradition and changed the home kit to an all red one, with an all white kit away kit to keep the tradition of red and white but that season it was strips not stripes. In the same way as the 125th anniversary kit was accepted, fans accepted looking like Liverpool as it was "only for one season"
Today this years kit was revealed and we discovered that an all red kit was not just for last season as this years is again all red, albeit the sleeves have white on them so that we look like Arsenal as well as Liverpool. You can see it here. The design is OK ( but Bristol City have gone for exactly the same shirt design) but there are no stripes, no black shorts and the socks are red and white hoops and look horrible! It appears that red and white stripes, the hallmark of the Saints image are gone for the foreseeable future and that saddens me in a way that took me by surprise. It doesn't feel like I'm watching the Saints when they're not in red and white stripes. it feels like they're...well anybody!
It appears that I'm not alone in this thought as most comments that I have read on both Facebook and the Echo website seem to agree (by about 8 out every 10 being against it), many saying they'll wear old striped shirts to make a point.
I'll get used to it I guess, but it would be good to see them when they win the Premier league in red and white stripes not look like Arsenapool!
The main thing is, as Richard that I work with said (and he was, rightly, fed up with me going on about the lack of stripes - sorry) "it's how they play this season that really matters, not what they wear".
Friday, 28 June 2013
Saturday, 15 June 2013
Radio nowhere
I'm of an age where most of my early musical knowledge came from either listening to music on the radio or from gathering in friends bedrooms listening to vinyl albums (or singles).
This meant that to me the radio was the prime source of listening to music and that stayed with me for years. In the car, in the house, in the office, the radio played the music. That's why Radio 1 was so important to me as a teenager and in my twenties and why Steve Wright, Johnnie Walker, Simon Bates, John Peel, DLT (!), Annie Nightingale, David "Kid" Jensen and Alan "Fluff" Freeman were household names and drew (by todays standards) huge audiences. I remember first hearing tracks from the keenly awaited new Yes album (Tormato) on the Saturday Rock show courtesy of Alan Freeman. I first heard Bohemian Rhapsody, while doing homework, on Annie Nightingale's Sunday afternoon show. (I actually thought that she had played two tracks by mistake such was the wow factor it left me with. 6 minute rock epics were not released as singles before then!!)
Technology has changed all of that of course and now we can have music when we want it , where we want it and how we want it. The only time that I attempt to listen to music on the radio is if it is either via a commercial station that effectively plays my iTunes library (Jack FM, Planet Rock and Wave FM (but only the Teenage Kicks programme on a Sunday night!!) Occasionally Radio 2 gets a listen, but I would prefer to listen to Radio 5 Live given the choice. I never, through choice, listen to the radio stations that play chart music and I suspect that I'm not alone in that and that's across an increasing demographic. My sons use Spotify, YouTube, Soundcloud and Bandcamp in addition to iTunes libraries.
Life for radio stations that play music is, however, about to get a whole lot harder following Apple announcing the arrival of iTunes Radio earlier this week. It will allow users to stream music based on the their iTunes library. So as I understand it, if for example, I play "Open Arms" by Elbow, iTunes radio will then stream songs similar to that and the more that I play, the more that it will build around my tastes. This will be free but you will get adverts dropped in (unless like me, you subscribe to iTunes Match).
Let's be clear, this is not new, Spotify and in America, Pandora ( and others) have been doing this for at least the last couple of years and music radio has survived largely intact, so why is Apple getting involved so potentially serious.
Well firstly iTunes is the default music player for most digital content. If you buy your music from an online shop other than iTunes, such as Amazon o other online music stores, they normally download via software that magically puts the music in your iTunes library. Thus most of my friends use iTunes to listen to music.
Secondly, large numbers of music listeners have at least one Apple device on which they also listen to their music. Even if you have a smartphone that is not made by Apple, you will most likely have either an iPod or iPad that is and via which you listen to music.
Well all of those devices will have iTunes radio embedded in them. It will be easy to use and will also help you find new music (assuming it's on iTunes).
To me that feels like a big change, Apple make things easy to use, intuitive and they market it well. It won't be an overnight change (the initial launch is only in the US but it won't be long before we have it in the UK) but in say five years time we may well look back on this launch as the beginning of the end for many of our music radio stations.
This meant that to me the radio was the prime source of listening to music and that stayed with me for years. In the car, in the house, in the office, the radio played the music. That's why Radio 1 was so important to me as a teenager and in my twenties and why Steve Wright, Johnnie Walker, Simon Bates, John Peel, DLT (!), Annie Nightingale, David "Kid" Jensen and Alan "Fluff" Freeman were household names and drew (by todays standards) huge audiences. I remember first hearing tracks from the keenly awaited new Yes album (Tormato) on the Saturday Rock show courtesy of Alan Freeman. I first heard Bohemian Rhapsody, while doing homework, on Annie Nightingale's Sunday afternoon show. (I actually thought that she had played two tracks by mistake such was the wow factor it left me with. 6 minute rock epics were not released as singles before then!!)
Technology has changed all of that of course and now we can have music when we want it , where we want it and how we want it. The only time that I attempt to listen to music on the radio is if it is either via a commercial station that effectively plays my iTunes library (Jack FM, Planet Rock and Wave FM (but only the Teenage Kicks programme on a Sunday night!!) Occasionally Radio 2 gets a listen, but I would prefer to listen to Radio 5 Live given the choice. I never, through choice, listen to the radio stations that play chart music and I suspect that I'm not alone in that and that's across an increasing demographic. My sons use Spotify, YouTube, Soundcloud and Bandcamp in addition to iTunes libraries.
Life for radio stations that play music is, however, about to get a whole lot harder following Apple announcing the arrival of iTunes Radio earlier this week. It will allow users to stream music based on the their iTunes library. So as I understand it, if for example, I play "Open Arms" by Elbow, iTunes radio will then stream songs similar to that and the more that I play, the more that it will build around my tastes. This will be free but you will get adverts dropped in (unless like me, you subscribe to iTunes Match).
Let's be clear, this is not new, Spotify and in America, Pandora ( and others) have been doing this for at least the last couple of years and music radio has survived largely intact, so why is Apple getting involved so potentially serious.
Well firstly iTunes is the default music player for most digital content. If you buy your music from an online shop other than iTunes, such as Amazon o other online music stores, they normally download via software that magically puts the music in your iTunes library. Thus most of my friends use iTunes to listen to music.
Secondly, large numbers of music listeners have at least one Apple device on which they also listen to their music. Even if you have a smartphone that is not made by Apple, you will most likely have either an iPod or iPad that is and via which you listen to music.
Well all of those devices will have iTunes radio embedded in them. It will be easy to use and will also help you find new music (assuming it's on iTunes).
To me that feels like a big change, Apple make things easy to use, intuitive and they market it well. It won't be an overnight change (the initial launch is only in the US but it won't be long before we have it in the UK) but in say five years time we may well look back on this launch as the beginning of the end for many of our music radio stations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Little pink houses
Im a bit behind with my travels, so I’ll cover a few stops in this one blog. After Pontevedra, I participated in some time travel. Unbeknow...
-
As a teenager in the 70's Monty Python was part of my formative years and the ability to be able to recite various sketches verbatim w...
-
I’m currently travelling in Northern Spain and my first stop was a costal town called Llanes. And as you can see there were boats and trai...
-
The global banking crisis is effecting everybody it appears and I have tried twice to write a blog that expresses my feelings..but nothing I...